Today I made my first visit to the classrooms of University of Liberia. Previously I attended a meeting with University President Conteh (formally a professor at University of Pennsylvania), where the discussion was more business in nature and didn’t allow for any interactions with students. Today’s visit was entirely different; my collegue/employer/undergraduate adviser was invited to give a guest lecture for an anthropological and sociological theory course.
I’ve found myself in these situations thanks to my brief three week stint working on a research project sponsored by the United States Institute of Peace and led by this professor of mine from Brown. (I’ve also had the opportunity to meet personally with numerous government ministers, UNMIL officials, and NGO officers, as well as the Speaker of the Liberian House of Representatives and the Vice President of the Country). Thirty-one meetings in seven days plus a two night stay in the hospital. I’ve been busy.
The research project I’m working on is a rule of law study in post-war Liberia. Unlike most rule of law projects which set out to understand the contours of law by examining legal code, this project is anthropological in nature and therefore focuses on the lived experience of law and justice. This is seriously complicated by the fact that Liberia has three systems of justice, none of which have clear boundaries: statutory law (that which informs the dysfunctional Monrovia-based legal system), customary law (codified “traditional” practices, falling entirely under the jurisdiction of the Minister of the Interior), and informal practice (justice carried out in the hands of individuals and communities). The particularities of these three systems are fascinating from what I’ve already learned I’ll try and expand on them in the future. In short though, the project aims to uncover the everyday practice of justice.
As it sounds, this is a momentous project and luckily we’re very well funded. In total, the research will last for a one year and will culminate in a national conference with the key stakeholders on law and justice issues, where the findings will be presented and possibilities for long term policy change discussed. The prof has the idea that the most effective sorts of policy change come from cultural compromises rather than judicial mandates. We hope this research will provide evidence to aid in the consolidation of the rule of law in Liberia in such a way that respects the varying meanings that Liberians attach to law and justice throughout the diverse communities in this country.
This stage of the research has taken us into the offices of many so called key players to explain our project, survey the situation, and look for opportunities for collaboration. Today we rolled into U of L in response to an invitation for the Prof to give a guest lecture, as well as meetings with the Institute for Research and the Kofi Annan Institute for Conflict Transformation. The invitation traveled through the care two of my other esteemed colleagues, Jimmy and Saah, both members of the Liberian diaspora from Holland and USA, respectively. Saah is my buddy from Providence and is back for the first time in seventeen years. These two men are absolutely hilarious together and attract attention in their every step through this country. The duo were good friends before they left, both leaders in student politics, a powerful forum in West Africa. Saah spins jokes like the true poet he is, and Jimmy is always there to hit right back. It was therefore no surprise today when the two men entered their alma mater that heads turned and many introductions were in order.
The experience today brought a mixed bag of emotions. Parts of the university, from upper administration, down to students, are incapacitated due to lack of funds and other vital resources, and left unable to carry out the proper functions of their positions. The physical infrastructure of the campus is atrocious,. One building we entered, a mess of cracking concrete, stripped of fixtures and accessories, and riddled with bullet holes, should have been condemned. Desks are in short supply, light bulbs a rarity, and books nearly non-existent. Because of the brain drain and deadlocking of education during the war, the faculty are predominantly first degree holders and unqualified to teach in a university environment. Students range widely in ages and capabilities, all attributable to the 20+ years of war. Some students even graduate with elementary level literacy skills. It’s a known fact that money serves as the prime means to obtaining a degree.
Nonetheless, I witnessed some very encouraging activities, including the conversation we had with the director of the Kofi Annan Institute about the need for national dialogue on issues surrounding diasporic wartime involvement and contemporary return. His experience of trying to bring various fighting factions together during the war in his role as leader of a church mediation program heavily informs his perspective on the issues of today. Unfortunately, our conversation was cut short by the Prof’s scheduled guest lecture.
Speaking to a room filled with eighty students and many listening from the windows and hallways, Prof gave a lecture on the importance of anthropological theory in understanding life in the post-war. Sweating profusely and trying not go over the heads of students, he hammered out some of basics of anthropology and argued outdated theory never dies but rather lives on in unusual forms, for example the activities of many development NGOs grounded largely in modernization theory. The prof urged the students to look critically at the world around them and challenge the status quo of development. I think students enjoyed what he had to say, although it might have been a bit over the top for some. After the lecture we met up with the Anth and Soc Students Association, who I hope to get back in touch with in some capacity upon starting my second job.
And with that, I’m out. I’ll try and post more about the research in the near future,